Monday, June 14, 2010

Teacher Fired For Premarital Sex

The past two weeks it seems like literalist Christians have been getting slammed by the media for their harebrained actions. Not that I mind assisting in spreading the word of such lunacy but this is getting ridiculous.

Bold red text is my emphasis. Ya know... the LEGAL stuff. Interesting read. Blog author's comments at the bottom.

*************************************************

Teacher fired for premarital sex

Jarretta Hamilton taught fourth grade at private Christian school

By Mike Celizic
TODAYshow.com contributor
updated 2 hours, 42 minutes ago

The couple sat close together with her right hand clasped in his left hand and her left arm cradling the 8-month-old daughter whose conception cost the woman her job.

The couple’s sin, according to her former employer, Southland Christian School in St. Cloud, Fla., is fornication — having sex before they got married.

Jarretta Hamilton and her husband of 16 months, Samuel Treftz, told TODAY’s Ann Curry Monday that the termination violated federal anti-discrimination laws. In addition, they allege in a pending lawsuit, the school’s principal, Jon Ennis, invaded Hamilton’s privacy by telling other teachers and the parents of her students the exact reason she was fired.

“When they let me go, they told the entire staff in a staff meeting that I had been fired and the reason why they let me go. And then they called all of my parents to my fourth-grade students and told them as well,” Hamilton said.

Ennis declined to appear on TODAY, citing a lawsuit filed by Hamilton against the school. But in a prerecorded report filed by NBC News’ Mike Taibbi, Ennis was asked if he stood by the firing. “Yes, absolutely,” he replied.

‘Didn’t know it would cost me my job’

Hamilton said her problems are all the result of her being honest. A widow with five children from her first marriage, she had gotten work as a teacher at Southland Christian School in January 2008. Meanwhile, she also met Treftz, and they planned a Feb. 20, 2009, wedding.

Three weeks before the wedding, she conceived her daughter, Sarah.

In April 2009, Hamilton and Treftz went together to Ennis and told him she would be taking maternity leave in the fall. She says Ennis first complained that it was difficult for the school to cover women on maternity leave.

“I was only requesting a standard six weeks maternity leave, and as the conversation progressed, he said, ‘I’m just trying to do the math here. When did you get married?’ ” Hamilton told Curry.

“I said Feb. 20,” she continued. “He said, ‘Well, did you conceive prior to marriage?’ I answered and I told him, ‘Yes.’ ”

Hamilton said she answered partly because she was so surprised by the very personal question.

“I was absolutely shocked. It came out of nowhere. I was honest about it. I didn’t know it would cost me my job,” she said.

Fired for ‘fornication’


A week later, she was notified that she was terminated. In a letter sent to her attorney, Edward Gay, last July, the school’s administrator, Julie Ennis, wrote:

“Jarretta was asked not to return because of a moral issue that was disregarded, namely fornication, sex outside of marriage. The employment application, which she filled out, clearly states that as a leader before our students we require all teachers to maintain and communicate the values and purpose of our school.”

That’s a long way from saying teachers are prohibited from having premarital sex, the couple argue.

“If there was a contract in place that had a specific morality clause, I think that would make a difference,” Treftz said.

Hamilton agreed, adding, “At least people would know what they’re getting into. I didn’t know that they were going to judge so harshly; that this was the way they felt about premarital sex. I wasn’t clear what their stance was on certain issues.”

Gay, who joined the couple for the TODAY interview, said that pastors and clergy have the right to make moral decisions regarding church personnel, but this case is different because Hamilton was a teacher.

“The courts have consistently ruled that a private school is just like any other employer. As long as there’s more than 50 employees, they are governed by the law regarding discrimination,” Gay said. “The teachers are serving a secular purpose, and therefore they are governed by federal laws of discrimination.”

In the letter explaining the termination to Gay, Julie Ennis ended by asking Hamilton to give up the lawsuit.

“We request that Jarretta withdraw her complaint and consider the testimony of the Lord,” the letter concludes.


*************************************************

"Consider the testimony of the Lord" ?!!! Ok. Premarital sex is bad. We get it. They're a parochial bunch of literalist Genesis lovers. But to illegally fire the woman is only brushing your school with tar and dumping on a few truckloads of fluffy white feathers for the world to see.

Jarretta was engaged. Not just dating. Engaged. Does that make it ok? .... erm... sorta? Ok, so I'm not all too keen on the whole chastity thing myself! I'm not the chaste kinda person. I prefer to see my life and the world as a game of "you take responsibility for what you do and everybody else can bite my ass." It's nobody else's business what goes on in my bedroom. Or my floor. Or the kitchen counter, for that matter! That's between me and the All.

If my employer openly disclosed IN A FULL STAFF MEETING why I was fired and then called all of the parents of the children I taught, damn skippy I'd be blowing a gasket! If she retracts that lawsuit she is not doing herself or any other consenting adult in this country a favor. The law is on her side and the rest is up to her concerning what exactly she 'should' feel sorry about. Somehow I don't think the whole guilt-trip-firing worked out so well for the school.

Also, I'm sure a great many of us can empathize with the whole 'so shocked so I answered truthfully' feeling she said she experienced. I've been in similar situations. Afterward I think to myself just how wrong it was for the person to have asked what they did but I think at heart people want to be honest so... our mouths kinda tattle on us when it shouldn't. Or rather, it's nobody's damn business but ours.

5 comments:

Dromedary Hump said...

"We request that Jarretta withdraw her complaint and consider the testimony of the Lord,”

Yeah, I bet they do. Those self serving hypocrites. If they REALLY considered the testamoney of Jebus they'd have said: "go and sin no more." and "those who are without sin cast the first stone." And kept the woman in her job.
I don't recall Jesus firing "sinners", dragging their name through the mud, and sanctamoneously condemning them. I guess they have a different New testament than me.

There was no morales clause in any contract. This woman will win her case for reinstatement and/or penalty for descrimination. If she sticks with the suit she could be rich. I hope she does. I hate these damnable religious fanatics.

Angel said...

Something else tickled my brain when rereading this post... the definition of "marriage."

Maybe that's for another post.

Paul said...

And the "christian community" wonders why why the rest of the world has animosity towards them. This is just one more reason why the pharisee minded religous people just piss me off. What happened to Love One Another.

Paul said...

Oh yeah another thing I just thought of. Mary was "engaged" to Joseph when she conceived Jesus. The whole Trinity must have known how that was going to go over. Thanks Angel it's kind of a slow night in surgery, I was needing an adrenaline rush

Angel said...

Paul, thanks for writing in. Always happy to help get your blood pressure up! lol Or at least make you cringe a bit. Me, I just shake my head as I post something like this. But it's all good. Once it's posted the feelings toward the subject softens a bit in my heart. I put the information out there and now it's other people's turn to get mad/happy/whatever floats their boat.

You are correct about Jesus' bastard conception. And the definition of marriage in the Bible opens itself to quite a bit of bad language on part of logic minded folks like you and me. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then gosh darn it-- it's a DUCK! Calling it a lovely water fowl doesn't suddenly, magically, turn a duck into a swan. Bastards are bastards, not matter how much revision the book goes through after Irenaeus' wicked pen finally runs out of ink.

I'm doing a post on this very topic later today.